About this candidate
Megan L Cotter represents House District 39 · Exeter, Hopkinton, Richmond.
At a glance
Democratic incumbent in the 2026 candidate roster.
How to read this page
Campaign positions, election returns, campaign finance and outside scorecards are labeled by source and period.
League of Women Voters · 2026 voter guide
Candidate-provided answers published by the League of Women Voters of South County. Statements are reproduced from the supplied October 2026 guide; they are not RIEP findings or endorsements.
1. Many residents feel that Rhode Island’s education funding formula needs reform. What would you recommend to the recently appointed Education Funding Commission?
I strongly supported creating a new legislative commission to take a comprehensive look at Rhode Island’s education funding formula. I had concerns about simply adopting the recommendations of the previous Blue Ribbon Commission because South County and regional school districts were not adequately represented in that process. Our communities face challenges that are very different from those of more densely populated districts, and they deserve a seat at the table.
My priorities are straightforward. First, the state needs to take greater responsibility for extraordinary special education costs. When one student requires extremely expensive services, a local school district and ultimately local property taxpayers should not be financially destabilized as a result. Rhode Island currently provides categorical funding for these
extraordinary costs, but reimbursements can be prorated when appropriations are insufficient.
Second, we need to address transportation. This is particularly important for large rural and regional districts, where buses travel significantly greater distances. Transportation is necessary to educate our children; it should be funded accordingly.
Finally, I believe Rhode Island should provide meaningful financial incentives for districts that voluntarily regionalize or share services. I have already introduced legislation aimed at strengthening those incentives. Regionalization will not work everywhere, but with declining enrollment and rising costs, communities willing to collaborate should have a reliable state partner.
2. What are your views on the 2nd amendment and gun legislation currently in place in RI?
I respect the Second Amendment and the constitutional rights of law-abiding Rhode Islanders. I also respect that people have deeply held concerns about gun violence and want government to take meaningful steps to keep their families and communities safe.
I voted against Rhode Island’s 2025 prohibited-firearms legislation. My concern was not a lack of concern for public safety. I questioned whether this particular approach would ultimately withstand constitutional scrutiny and whether Rhode Island taxpayers could be left paying the cost of prolonged litigation.
That concern is not hypothetical. Courts across the country continue to consider challenges involving restrictions on semiautomatic firearms, and the constitutional boundaries of these laws remain the subject of significant litigation. At the same time, courts have upheld some firearm restrictions, so I do not think it would be responsible to claim that Rhode Island’s law will definitely be overturned.
I believe we can protect constitutional rights while taking gun violence seriously. I will continue evaluating firearm legislation individually, based on whether it is constitutional, enforceable and likely to make Rhode Islanders safer.
My responsibility is to listen to those perspectives, examine the legislation carefully and cast the vote I believe best serves the people I represent.
3. Residents of RI are having increasing difficulty with access to affordable health care services. What are your specific ideas to improve this situation near and long-term?
Access to affordable health care is especially challenging in rural communities, and this has been one of my priorities since entering the General Assembly.
Early in my first term, I worked with Wood River Health and RIPTA to identify funding that enabled Wood River Health to secure a van to transport patients to medical appointments. Today, Wood River Health provides free van transportation to patients for medical and dental appointments. That work earned me the Rhode Island Health Center Association’s John H. Chafee Healthcare Leadership Award, but more importantly, it helped remove a very real barrier to care for our neighbors.
Transportation, however, is only one piece of the problem. Rhode Island also needs to ensure that reimbursement rates are competitive enough to attract and retain physicians, nurses, behavioral health professionals and other providers. We cannot expect providers to remain here if neighboring states consistently offer substantially better reimbursement and compensation.
In the near term, we should prioritize reimbursement increases in areas experiencing the greatest provider shortages and continue protecting community health centers and programs such as 340B that keep care accessible locally. I have worked across party lines on legislation aimed at protecting that program.
Long term, Rhode Island needs a sustainable reimbursement strategy that keeps providers here. Having insurance means very little if you cannot find a doctor who can see you.
4. What is your position with regard to the federal government trying to gain access to our voter rolls?
I support Secretary of State Gregg Amore’s decision to protect Rhode Islanders’ private voter information, and the federal court’s ruling affirmed that position.
I believe Rhode Island should maintain accurate voter rolls, conduct secure elections and comply fully with legitimate federal and state election laws. Secretary Amore’s office has an established voter-list maintenance process designed to keep Rhode Island’s rolls accurate.
5. The General Assembly has enacted a series of laws that increasingly preempt local zoning authority and require municipalities to accommodate additional residential density and development. How do you reconcile the impact and demand of these policies with the local infrastructure capacities in RI towns?
Rhode Island unquestionably needs more housing. But we also need to build responsibly. State housing policy cannot ignore the very real infrastructure limitations of rural communities.
That is particularly important in communities that depend on private wells, septic systems and groundwater rather than municipal water and sewer infrastructure. Increasing density without understanding an area’s water capacity can have long-term consequences for existing residents, future homeowners and the environment.
That is why I introduced legislation addressing groundwater protection and why I will chair the newly created legislative commission studying water-supply planning for new housing developments in Rhode Island’s rural communities. The commission was enacted in June 2026 specifically to examine how housing development can be balanced with safe and sustainable drinking-water supplies.
This should not be framed as a choice between protecting our environment and creating housing. We need to accomplish both.
I support increasing Rhode Island’s housing supply, but development needs to reflect the infrastructure of the community in which it is being built. Before requiring significantly greater density,
we should understand whether the water supply, wastewater systems, roads and other infrastructure can safely accommodate it.
Good housing policy is not simply about the number of units we build. It is about building homes in places and in ways that will remain sustainable for generations.
6. What differentiates you as a candidate and if elected, what will be your top priority during your term?
What differentiates me is a record of delivering tangible results for the communities I represent while working across party lines to get them done.
Early in my first term, I helped Wood River Health secure transportation funding through RIPTA for a patient transportation van, work that earned me the Rhode Island Health Center Association’s John H. Chafee Healthcare Leadership Award. I have also worked across party lines to protect the 340B program that community health centers depend upon.
I have made rural Rhode Island a priority at the State House. I chaired the Forest Management and Fire Prevention Commission, helped make the Green Bond greener by securing significant investments in forest management, and fought for $50,000 to replace forestry hose that had not been replaced since the 1980s. I also introduced legislation to protect groundwater from overdevelopment and will chair a commission examining water capacity and housing development in rural communities.
I have pushed for sustainable school funding and stronger incentives for regionalization and shared services.
My top priority remains making Rhode Island more affordable while protecting our quality of life. That means accessible health care, strong schools, responsible housing, lower utility costs, healthy forests, and reducing pressure on property taxpayers.
7. Y/N: Will you support legislation that strengthens and codifies voting rights in RI?
Yes
The guide’s response heading spells the first name “Meghan”; its candidate list and this profile use Megan L Cotter.
Campaign priorities
Family and senior costs
Supports child tax credits, retirement tax relief, property tax relief, and limits on utility company profits.
Schools and children
Prioritizes school aid, early development services, and student mental health.
Health care
Supports Medicaid funding, affordable prescriptions, and access to local medical appointments.
Forests and farmland
Prioritizes forest management, fire readiness, farmland preservation, and open space.
Taxpayer oversight
Supports an independent inspector general to investigate waste and protect taxpayer funds.
Official campaign website. Summaries attributed to the sources shown.
Past electoral performance
Districtwide general election results. Select a year to open RIEP’s results map.
Democratic primary history
House District 39 · Share of votes cast for named candidates.
Rhode Island Board of Elections ↗. Official 2026 results updated September 15, 2026. Earlier primary years are under construction.
Campaign finance snapshot
28-days-before-election report · 2026 · July 1, 2026 to October 5, 2026. Figures describe the stated reporting period.
The filing separately reports $500.00 in accounts payable.
Record in office · 2025–2026 General Assembly
Session attendance
Presence recorded in official House Journals. “Not Voting” on a floor vote is not treated as an absence. Attendance rate is a percentage.
- Leadership
- No leadership role listed
- Committees
- House Education Committee · House Health and Human Services Committee · House Small Business Committee
Official committee roster · Dataset updated August 30, 2026.
Vote-based ideology
How Megan L Cotter’s recorded votes compare with other representatives. This feature is under construction and measures voting patterns, not legislative effectiveness.
Loading voting records…
How this is calculated
One-dimensional W-NOMINATE estimates positions from 450 divided roll calls in 91 official House journals. Similar positions indicate similar voting patterns in this vote set. Party labels color the points; they are not used to estimate the positions. The positive direction is anchored to Michael Chippendale; zero is not a calibrated ideological center.
Coverage ends June 11, 2026. Named votes reconcile with printed totals in all 1,210 extracted binary roll calls. Missing votes and recusals are not counted as Nay. Annual fits are separately scaled and cannot measure ideological change directly. House and Senate coordinates are not directly comparable.
This experimental analysis is separate from CEL’s Legislative Effectiveness Score and RIEP’s Legislative Progress Index. View all representatives and methodology → · Official House journals ↗
Bills & votes
Megan L Cotter’s 54 lead-sponsored bills in the 2025–2026 General Assembly, from RIEP’s official-source research. Passage and law status reflect the recorded snapshot; “Not recorded” does not describe the current disposition of a bill.
Lead-sponsored records · 2025–2026 54 records
| Bill | Year | Passed chamber | Became law |
|---|---|---|---|
| H5018 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5098 | 2025 | Yes | Yes |
| H5155 | 2025 | Yes | Yes |
| H5157 | 2025 | Yes | Yes |
| H5165 | 2025 | Yes | Yes |
| H5194 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5201 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5202 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5204 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5214 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5551 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5572 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5577 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5597 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5607 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5618 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5781 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5830 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H5859 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H6057 | 2025 | Yes | Not recorded |
| H6248 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H6282 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H6365 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H6373 | 2025 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7072 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7217 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7243 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7290 | 2026 | Yes | Yes |
| H7318 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7334 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7446 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7567 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7582 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7586 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7632 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7671 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7681 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7682 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7700 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7733 | 2026 | Yes | Not recorded |
| H7743 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7869 | 2026 | Yes | Yes |
| H7887 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7888 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7892 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7896 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H7983 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H8144 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H8153 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H8295 | 2026 | Yes | Yes |
| H8502 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H8512 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H8522 | 2026 | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| H8527 | 2026 | Yes | Yes |
Source: RIEP research using Rhode Island General Assembly bill-status records, August 30, 2026 snapshot.
Outside ratings & scorecards
Each organization uses its own methodology. RIEP does not combine these into an overall candidate score.
Center for Effective Lawmaking
Historical score covering the 2023–2024 legislative session. It does not measure Megan L Cotter’s 2025–2026 record.
The party rank compares this legislator with other members of the same party in the same chamber. CEL’s expectations label uses a separate benchmark that accounts for party status, seniority and committee leadership. “Meets Expectations” means a score between 50% and 150% of that benchmark; it does not mean an average party rank. How CEL defines expectations ↗
View full legislative effectiveness details
The score weights advancement by bill significance. The expected benchmark accounts for comparable legislators’ party status, seniority and committee leadership.
| Category | Bills introduced | Committee action | Beyond committee | Passed chamber | Became law |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commemorative | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substantive | 33 | 33 | 8 | 7 | 3 |
| Substantive and significant | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Historical scores
2023–2024 · 0.85 · Party rank 40 of 66
Produced by the Center for Effective Lawmaking at the University of Virginia and Vanderbilt University, not by RIEP. Source report ↗ · Methodology ↗ · Glossary ↗
Three-stage legislative progress index
View entire 2025–2026 House ranking →
Why RIEP publishes a current-session index
CEL’s Legislative Effectiveness Score is our research benchmark. The CEL data presented here cover 2023–2024 and have not been extended to the 2025–2026 session. RIEP’s provisional index provides a current-session view of bill sponsorship and advancement while that historical score remains available for context.
RIEP uses three equally weighted stages and a House average of 1. It does not reproduce CEL’s five-stage method, bill-significance weights or expected-performance model. “Above” or “below House average” describes this index only; it is not a CEL expectations label.
Compare RIEP and CEL scores for the same 2023–2024 session →Lead-sponsored bills, bills passed by the House, and bills that became law, compared with all 75 House district records. A score of 1 represents the comparison-set average.
View calculation and methodology
Each stage receives equal weight. Divide Megan L Cotter’s count at each stage by the corresponding House total, average the three shares, and multiply by 75. Rank uses unrounded scores; equal scores share a rank. Bills that become law contribute at each stage they reach. Cosponsored bills and resolutions are excluded.
75 ÷ 3 × (54 ÷ 2469 + 10 ÷ 648 + 8 ÷ 501) = 1.331784.
House totals: 2,469 lead-sponsored bills; 648 bills passed by the House; 501 bills became law.
Dataset updated: September 22, 2026. The complete House calculation dataset includes all 75 district records, including representatives not running in 2026. These snapshot counts are not a live legislative feed.
Prototype only. This is a separate RIEP progress index, not an update to the Center for Effective Lawmaking’s score or an overall assessment of a legislator. It does not include committee-action stages or bill-significance weights. Party comparisons use the 2025–2026 House roster.
Underlying bill records: Official Rhode Island Bill Status/History ↗
This is the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns' score, not an RIEP assessment. Denominators below nine reflect absences, recusals, or other non-votes in the League's published scorecard. Source report ↗
The ACLU selected these votes to highlight civil-liberties issues. An aligned vote matches its stated position; an opposed vote does not. The selection does not cover every relevant bill or capture committee and floor leadership, so RIEP does not convert it into an overall grade.
This is an ACLU of Rhode Island voting record, not an RIEP score or endorsement. RIEP displays the underlying organization-selected record without converting it into a percentage, grade, rank, or aggregate candidate rating. The ACLU states that its selected votes do not cover every bill with civil-liberties implications and do not capture committee or floor leadership. Source report ↗
Endorsements
Published endorsements from outside organizations. Select an organization to view its endorsement source.
2026 election · House District 39
2026 election · House District 39
Outside organizations’ endorsements, not RIEP endorsements. Sources may include organization lists and voter-guide records.
Under construction
Additional bill summaries, floor votes, earlier primary results and digital footprint research will be added after review.

