Rhode Island Elections ProjectIndependent election information
Candidate profile under construction · Data last reviewed October 6, 2026
Rhode Island House · District 39

Megan L Cotter

Democrat · Incumbent · Exeter, Hopkinton, Richmond

2026 candidate
Portrait of Rhode Island Representative Megan L Cotter

Portrait: Rhode Island General Assembly ↗

About this candidate

Megan L Cotter represents House District 39 · Exeter, Hopkinton, Richmond.

At a glance

Democratic incumbent in the 2026 candidate roster.

How to read this page

Campaign positions, election returns, campaign finance and outside scorecards are labeled by source and period.

Official General Assembly biography ↗

League of Women Voters · 2026 voter guide

Candidate-provided answers published by the League of Women Voters of South County. Statements are reproduced from the supplied October 2026 guide; they are not RIEP findings or endorsements.

1. Many residents feel that Rhode Island’s education funding formula needs reform. What would you recommend to the recently appointed Education Funding Commission?

I strongly supported creating a new legislative commission to take a comprehensive look at Rhode Island’s education funding formula. I had concerns about simply adopting the recommendations of the previous Blue Ribbon Commission because South County and regional school districts were not adequately represented in that process. Our communities face challenges that are very different from those of more densely populated districts, and they deserve a seat at the table.

My priorities are straightforward. First, the state needs to take greater responsibility for extraordinary special education costs. When one student requires extremely expensive services, a local school district and ultimately local property taxpayers should not be financially destabilized as a result. Rhode Island currently provides categorical funding for these

extraordinary costs, but reimbursements can be prorated when appropriations are insufficient.

Second, we need to address transportation. This is particularly important for large rural and regional districts, where buses travel significantly greater distances. Transportation is necessary to educate our children; it should be funded accordingly.

Finally, I believe Rhode Island should provide meaningful financial incentives for districts that voluntarily regionalize or share services. I have already introduced legislation aimed at strengthening those incentives. Regionalization will not work everywhere, but with declining enrollment and rising costs, communities willing to collaborate should have a reliable state partner.

2. What are your views on the 2nd amendment and gun legislation currently in place in RI?

I respect the Second Amendment and the constitutional rights of law-abiding Rhode Islanders. I also respect that people have deeply held concerns about gun violence and want government to take meaningful steps to keep their families and communities safe.

I voted against Rhode Island’s 2025 prohibited-firearms legislation. My concern was not a lack of concern for public safety. I questioned whether this particular approach would ultimately withstand constitutional scrutiny and whether Rhode Island taxpayers could be left paying the cost of prolonged litigation.

That concern is not hypothetical. Courts across the country continue to consider challenges involving restrictions on semiautomatic firearms, and the constitutional boundaries of these laws remain the subject of significant litigation. At the same time, courts have upheld some firearm restrictions, so I do not think it would be responsible to claim that Rhode Island’s law will definitely be overturned.

I believe we can protect constitutional rights while taking gun violence seriously. I will continue evaluating firearm legislation individually, based on whether it is constitutional, enforceable and likely to make Rhode Islanders safer.

My responsibility is to listen to those perspectives, examine the legislation carefully and cast the vote I believe best serves the people I represent.

3. Residents of RI are having increasing difficulty with access to affordable health care services. What are your specific ideas to improve this situation near and long-term?

Access to affordable health care is especially challenging in rural communities, and this has been one of my priorities since entering the General Assembly.

Early in my first term, I worked with Wood River Health and RIPTA to identify funding that enabled Wood River Health to secure a van to transport patients to medical appointments. Today, Wood River Health provides free van transportation to patients for medical and dental appointments. That work earned me the Rhode Island Health Center Association’s John H. Chafee Healthcare Leadership Award, but more importantly, it helped remove a very real barrier to care for our neighbors.

Transportation, however, is only one piece of the problem. Rhode Island also needs to ensure that reimbursement rates are competitive enough to attract and retain physicians, nurses, behavioral health professionals and other providers. We cannot expect providers to remain here if neighboring states consistently offer substantially better reimbursement and compensation.

In the near term, we should prioritize reimbursement increases in areas experiencing the greatest provider shortages and continue protecting community health centers and programs such as 340B that keep care accessible locally. I have worked across party lines on legislation aimed at protecting that program.

Long term, Rhode Island needs a sustainable reimbursement strategy that keeps providers here. Having insurance means very little if you cannot find a doctor who can see you.

4. What is your position with regard to the federal government trying to gain access to our voter rolls?

I support Secretary of State Gregg Amore’s decision to protect Rhode Islanders’ private voter information, and the federal court’s ruling affirmed that position.

I believe Rhode Island should maintain accurate voter rolls, conduct secure elections and comply fully with legitimate federal and state election laws. Secretary Amore’s office has an established voter-list maintenance process designed to keep Rhode Island’s rolls accurate.

5. The General Assembly has enacted a series of laws that increasingly preempt local zoning authority and require municipalities to accommodate additional residential density and development. How do you reconcile the impact and demand of these policies with the local infrastructure capacities in RI towns?

Rhode Island unquestionably needs more housing. But we also need to build responsibly. State housing policy cannot ignore the very real infrastructure limitations of rural communities.

That is particularly important in communities that depend on private wells, septic systems and groundwater rather than municipal water and sewer infrastructure. Increasing density without understanding an area’s water capacity can have long-term consequences for existing residents, future homeowners and the environment.

That is why I introduced legislation addressing groundwater protection and why I will chair the newly created legislative commission studying water-supply planning for new housing developments in Rhode Island’s rural communities. The commission was enacted in June 2026 specifically to examine how housing development can be balanced with safe and sustainable drinking-water supplies.

This should not be framed as a choice between protecting our environment and creating housing. We need to accomplish both.

I support increasing Rhode Island’s housing supply, but development needs to reflect the infrastructure of the community in which it is being built. Before requiring significantly greater density,

we should understand whether the water supply, wastewater systems, roads and other infrastructure can safely accommodate it.

Good housing policy is not simply about the number of units we build. It is about building homes in places and in ways that will remain sustainable for generations.

6. What differentiates you as a candidate and if elected, what will be your top priority during your term?

What differentiates me is a record of delivering tangible results for the communities I represent while working across party lines to get them done.

Early in my first term, I helped Wood River Health secure transportation funding through RIPTA for a patient transportation van, work that earned me the Rhode Island Health Center Association’s John H. Chafee Healthcare Leadership Award. I have also worked across party lines to protect the 340B program that community health centers depend upon.

I have made rural Rhode Island a priority at the State House. I chaired the Forest Management and Fire Prevention Commission, helped make the Green Bond greener by securing significant investments in forest management, and fought for $50,000 to replace forestry hose that had not been replaced since the 1980s. I also introduced legislation to protect groundwater from overdevelopment and will chair a commission examining water capacity and housing development in rural communities.

I have pushed for sustainable school funding and stronger incentives for regionalization and shared services.

My top priority remains making Rhode Island more affordable while protecting our quality of life. That means accessible health care, strong schools, responsible housing, lower utility costs, healthy forests, and reducing pressure on property taxpayers.

7. Y/N: Will you support legislation that strengthens and codifies voting rights in RI?

Yes

The guide’s response heading spells the first name “Meghan”; its candidate list and this profile use Megan L Cotter.

Read the original League voter guide · page 3 ↗

Browse League guide responses and sources →

Campaign priorities

Family and senior costs

Supports child tax credits, retirement tax relief, property tax relief, and limits on utility company profits.

Schools and children

Prioritizes school aid, early development services, and student mental health.

Health care

Supports Medicaid funding, affordable prescriptions, and access to local medical appointments.

Forests and farmland

Prioritizes forest management, fire readiness, farmland preservation, and open space.

Taxpayer oversight

Supports an independent inspector general to investigate waste and protect taxpayer funds.

Official campaign website. Summaries attributed to the sources shown.

Past electoral performance

Districtwide general election results. Select a year to open RIEP’s results map.

2024
Winner · 4,671 votesDistrictwide general election
54.0%
2022
Winner · 3,031 votesDistrictwide general election
45.2%
2020
Runner-up · 3,860 votesDistrictwide general election
48.0%

Democratic primary history

House District 39 · Share of votes cast for named candidates.

2026
1,375 votesUncontested Democratic primary · Official results
100%

Rhode Island Board of Elections ↗. Official 2026 results updated September 15, 2026. Earlier primary years are under construction.

Campaign finance snapshot

28-days-before-election report · 2026 · July 1, 2026 to October 5, 2026. Figures describe the stated reporting period.

$21,264.19Total receipts
$19,403.05Spent during period
$30,461.34Cash at period end
View Megan L Cotter’s campaign finance →

The filing separately reports $500.00 in accounts payable.

Open 28-days-before-election financial report (PDF) ↗

Record in office · 2025–2026 General Assembly

54Lead-sponsored bills
253Bills cosponsored
10Lead bills passed chamber
8Lead bills became law

Session attendance

91Sessions eligible
90Sessions present
1Sessions absent
98.9%Attendance rate

Presence recorded in official House Journals. “Not Voting” on a floor vote is not treated as an absence. Attendance rate is a percentage.

Leadership
No leadership role listed
Committees
House Education Committee · House Health and Human Services Committee · House Small Business Committee

Official committee roster · Dataset updated August 30, 2026.

Experimental · 2025–2026 House

Vote-based ideology

How Megan L Cotter’s recorded votes compare with other representatives. This feature is under construction and measures voting patterns, not legislative effectiveness.

Loading voting records…

How this is calculated

One-dimensional W-NOMINATE estimates positions from 450 divided roll calls in 91 official House journals. Similar positions indicate similar voting patterns in this vote set. Party labels color the points; they are not used to estimate the positions. The positive direction is anchored to Michael Chippendale; zero is not a calibrated ideological center.

Coverage ends June 11, 2026. Named votes reconcile with printed totals in all 1,210 extracted binary roll calls. Missing votes and recusals are not counted as Nay. Annual fits are separately scaled and cannot measure ideological change directly. House and Senate coordinates are not directly comparable.

This experimental analysis is separate from CEL’s Legislative Effectiveness Score and RIEP’s Legislative Progress Index. View all representatives and methodology → · Official House journals ↗

Bills & votes

Megan L Cotter’s 54 lead-sponsored bills in the 2025–2026 General Assembly, from RIEP’s official-source research. Passage and law status reflect the recorded snapshot; “Not recorded” does not describe the current disposition of a bill.

Lead-sponsored records · 2025–2026 54 records
BillYearPassed chamberBecame law
H50182025Not recordedNot recorded
H50982025YesYes
H51552025YesYes
H51572025YesYes
H51652025YesYes
H51942025Not recordedNot recorded
H52012025Not recordedNot recorded
H52022025Not recordedNot recorded
H52042025Not recordedNot recorded
H52142025Not recordedNot recorded
H55512025Not recordedNot recorded
H55722025Not recordedNot recorded
H55772025Not recordedNot recorded
H55972025Not recordedNot recorded
H56072025Not recordedNot recorded
H56182025Not recordedNot recorded
H57812025Not recordedNot recorded
H58302025Not recordedNot recorded
H58592025Not recordedNot recorded
H60572025YesNot recorded
H62482025Not recordedNot recorded
H62822025Not recordedNot recorded
H63652025Not recordedNot recorded
H63732025Not recordedNot recorded
H70722026Not recordedNot recorded
H72172026Not recordedNot recorded
H72432026Not recordedNot recorded
H72902026YesYes
H73182026Not recordedNot recorded
H73342026Not recordedNot recorded
H74462026Not recordedNot recorded
H75672026Not recordedNot recorded
H75822026Not recordedNot recorded
H75862026Not recordedNot recorded
H76322026Not recordedNot recorded
H76712026Not recordedNot recorded
H76812026Not recordedNot recorded
H76822026Not recordedNot recorded
H77002026Not recordedNot recorded
H77332026YesNot recorded
H77432026Not recordedNot recorded
H78692026YesYes
H78872026Not recordedNot recorded
H78882026Not recordedNot recorded
H78922026Not recordedNot recorded
H78962026Not recordedNot recorded
H79832026Not recordedNot recorded
H81442026Not recordedNot recorded
H81532026Not recordedNot recorded
H82952026YesYes
H85022026Not recordedNot recorded
H85122026Not recordedNot recorded
H85222026Not recordedNot recorded
H85272026YesYes

Source: RIEP research using Rhode Island General Assembly bill-status records, August 30, 2026 snapshot.

Outside ratings & scorecards

Each organization uses its own methodology. RIEP does not combine these into an overall candidate score.

Legislative effectiveness · 2023–2024

Center for Effective Lawmaking

0.85Expected benchmark: 0.886

Historical score covering the 2023–2024 legislative session. It does not measure Megan L Cotter’s 2025–2026 record.

Meets Expectations#40 of 66 House Democrats

The party rank compares this legislator with other members of the same party in the same chamber. CEL’s expectations label uses a separate benchmark that accounts for party status, seniority and committee leadership. “Meets Expectations” means a score between 50% and 150% of that benchmark; it does not mean an average party rank. How CEL defines expectations ↗

33Bills introduced
33Committee action
8Beyond committee
7Passed chamber
3Became law
View full legislative effectiveness details

The score weights advancement by bill significance. The expected benchmark accounts for comparable legislators’ party status, seniority and committee leadership.

CategoryBills introducedCommittee actionBeyond committeePassed chamberBecame law
Commemorative00000
Substantive3333873
Substantive and significant00000

Historical scores

2023–2024 · 0.85 · Party rank 40 of 66

Produced by the Center for Effective Lawmaking at the University of Virginia and Vanderbilt University, not by RIEP. Source report ↗ · Methodology ↗ · Glossary ↗

Experimental RIEP calculation · 2025–2026

Three-stage legislative progress index

1.33#24 of 75 House district records

#24 of 64 House DemocratsAbove House average

View entire 2025–2026 House ranking →

Why RIEP publishes a current-session index

CEL’s Legislative Effectiveness Score is our research benchmark. The CEL data presented here cover 2023–2024 and have not been extended to the 2025–2026 session. RIEP’s provisional index provides a current-session view of bill sponsorship and advancement while that historical score remains available for context.

RIEP uses three equally weighted stages and a House average of 1. It does not reproduce CEL’s five-stage method, bill-significance weights or expected-performance model. “Above” or “below House average” describes this index only; it is not a CEL expectations label.

Compare RIEP and CEL scores for the same 2023–2024 session →

Lead-sponsored bills, bills passed by the House, and bills that became law, compared with all 75 House district records. A score of 1 represents the comparison-set average.

54Lead-sponsored
10Passed House
8Became law
View calculation and methodology

Each stage receives equal weight. Divide Megan L Cotter’s count at each stage by the corresponding House total, average the three shares, and multiply by 75. Rank uses unrounded scores; equal scores share a rank. Bills that become law contribute at each stage they reach. Cosponsored bills and resolutions are excluded.

75 ÷ 3 × (54 ÷ 2469 + 10 ÷ 648 + 8 ÷ 501) = 1.331784.

House totals: 2,469 lead-sponsored bills; 648 bills passed by the House; 501 bills became law.

Dataset updated: September 22, 2026. The complete House calculation dataset includes all 75 district records, including representatives not running in 2026. These snapshot counts are not a live legislative feed.

Prototype only. This is a separate RIEP progress index, not an update to the Center for Effective Lawmaking’s score or an overall assessment of a legislator. It does not include committee-action stages or bill-significance weights. Party comparisons use the 2025–2026 House roster.

Underlying bill records: Official Rhode Island Bill Status/History ↗

RI League of Cities and Towns · 2025Votes on nine 2025 bills and budget items selected by the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns as priorities affecting municipalities, local authority, municipal budgets, public employees, state aid, and local taxpayers.
6/9

This is the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns' score, not an RIEP assessment. Denominators below nine reflect absences, recusals, or other non-votes in the League's published scorecard. Source report ↗

ACLU of Rhode Island · 2025Individual roll-call record on 11 House votes selected by the ACLU of Rhode Island as key civil-liberties issues for the 2025 session. The source shows, vote by vote, whether the legislator's vote matched the ACLU's stated position, opposed it, or was absent/otherwise not voting.
7/11

The ACLU selected these votes to highlight civil-liberties issues. An aligned vote matches its stated position; an opposed vote does not. The selection does not cover every relevant bill or capture committee and floor leadership, so RIEP does not convert it into an overall grade.

ACLU of Rhode Island · 2025 voting record

Eleven House votes selected by the ACLU. The labels compare Megan L Cotter’s vote with the ACLU’s position.

1Economic Justice✓ Aligned with ACLU position
2Freedom of Speech× Opposed ACLU position
3Freedom to Read Act✓ Aligned with ACLU position
4Racial Justice✓ Aligned with ACLU position
5Criminal Justice× Opposed ACLU position
6Voting Rights✓ Aligned with ACLU position
7HIV Testing Mandate Repeal✓ Aligned with ACLU position
8Hairstyle Discrimination✓ Aligned with ACLU position
9Criminal Justice — election officials× Opposed ACLU position
10Student Privacy✓ Aligned with ACLU position
11Political Speech× Opposed ACLU position

This is an ACLU of Rhode Island voting record, not an RIEP score or endorsement. RIEP displays the underlying organization-selected record without converting it into a percentage, grade, rank, or aggregate candidate rating. The ACLU states that its selected votes do not cover every bill with civil-liberties implications and do not capture committee or floor leadership. Source report ↗

Endorsements

Published endorsements from outside organizations. Select an organization to view its endorsement source.

Climate Action Rhode Island ↗

2026 election · House District 39

Planned Parenthood Votes! Rhode Island PAC ↗

2026 election · House District 39

Outside organizations’ endorsements, not RIEP endorsements. Sources may include organization lists and voter-guide records.

Under construction

Additional bill summaries, floor votes, earlier primary results and digital footprint research will be added after review.